Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/337 A (II) / 148/149 bail firing and no one was charged with the other accused. It was on an unimportant part of the witness's body, which was charged with the prosecution's testimony with another accused on the head, which was declared simple in nature. Due to allegedly running a hatchet on the complainant's head, but it was not readily known whether the allegations against the two accused were factually true, the case was of two versions, an FIR I was promoted by the complaining party and the other was developed by the accused party. A statement by one of the defendants in front of the investigating officer killed one person and three people were injured and the total number of injuries resulting from the complaint was seven compared to that of the ant party. The seven members of the accused group had 35 wounds on various parts of the body and such injuries were caused by fire arms, sharp and broken weapons but were still pending before the trial court. ? On the basis of the evidence that in fact the aggressor challan was already presented in this party, the accused had already spent eight months in jail and continued detention of the accused in jail is unlikely to fulfill any beneficial purpose. He was convicted on bail under section 497, sub-section (2) of CR PC, on a charge of seeking further investigation into the matter. top civil advocates from Patika lawyer