Find a Lawyer

QAMRUDDIN RAZA versus THE PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF SINDH, KARACHI AND ANOTHER

Section 9 Sindh Service Tribunal Act (XV of 1973), Section 4 Sindh Service Tribunal (Code of Conduct), 1974, R 25 Publicity Intelligence Appeal-to-Service Tribunal Appellant Senior Superintendent Deputy Superintendent of Police and Superintendent of Police Three. Was on hold. The PD section was filled up, empty, the Inspector General of Police sent six PD section PK cases to the governor so that their development could be considered and the appellant's name topped the list. The name of the appellant and two others were proposed for promotion to the post of superintendent of police and submitted to a summary governor who refused to approve the appellant's advertisement for the impression that \ Time has passed, the appellant's name was sent for promotion twice due to poor fitness, but the provincial selection board meeting was not summoned due to an error in the appellant's proper time. There was no hindrance in the way of publicity except that the summary submitted to the Governor / Authorized Authority was placed before him. The governor / competent authority declined because Varna Appellant was retired from his job. , Only on the basis of the contract of approval for the promotion of the appellant when he was presented before the Governor's Late meetings of the Provincial Selection Committee and the appointment of the appellant's delay before the Governor was he retired. There were no valid grounds to lose them. Having been promoted to the post of superintendent of police, there must be a plausible and credible reason for refusing to approve the appellant. top advocate from Karachi lawyer