Sections 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 201, 109 and 34 of Pul-i-Amad, which cause the disappearance of evidence of crime, or give false information to the screen offender, Further Inquiry Grant. And the co-accused were alleged to have committed the murder of the complainant's son (deceased). The conviction of the accused was that it had no active role in the private complaint in the FIR or thereafter. That the two co-accused were already acquitted of the charge and another co-accused was out of jail due to a compromise between the parties. One of the witnesses to the incident was convicted and sentenced to death in connection with the criminal trial. That the other two witnesses have submitted their affidavits regarding the innocence of the accused and have also recorded their statements before the trial court, and the complainant in this case has already died. At the time of the incident, the suspect twisted the victim's weapon, causing him to fall to the ground and a fellow suspect shot him. A private complaint also cited the victim's statement immediately after his death, stating that the victim had been killed. Because he had abused a co-accused. Deced did not specify any role for the accused and only stated that he was present on the occasion, in which case the accused was not assigned any active role, and the question of his implied liability was not settled by trial. Could have been done. Two witnesses of the court not only submitted their affidavits to the court regarding the innocence of the accused.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
