USMAN TARIQ versus PUNJAB PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
The Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Petition Joint Competitive Examiner who suffered failure in English structure papers was not eligible by the Commission for appearing in the interview; There was nothing wrong with counting and marking it. By the Commission's refusal to review applicant numbers, a question in a paper containing 30 questions may be answered by a petitioner to mark such paper against the applicant or chairman of the Commission. Had also failed to identify any type of crime, fraud or misconduct. Because of the technical documentation, the retaliatory documents can be identified by specialists, not by constitutional jurisdictional high courts, primarily to correct jurisdictional errors in the impugned orders of tribunals or executive authorities, But merit cannot be invoked to make decisions. Under the relevant law, the High Court could not record inquiries or evidence for determining such disputed facts, re-examining the papers, if directed by the High Court. , An endless stream of litigation will end, leaving the entire commission system at stake. Constitutional application in the circumstances \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
