Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus SME BANK LIMITED

Sections 9 and 10 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908); Oii, R 11 Decision of cause of action for trial Response to leave for appeal and defense, decision not to effect effect suit for account approval The petitioner bank was filed by the applicants in which the leave appeared and the petition for defense was filed by the Bank of Banking Court to defend the case without deciding to apply for leave, The plaintiff filed by the appellant dismisses that the plaintiff did not show any reason for the action while the cause of the legal proceedings While rejecting the plaintiff on non-disclosure, generally the facts stated in the plaintiff must be considered correct and any data and materials provided by the defense should not be viewed because the Banking Court allowed leave application. Was not given, so the plaintiff could not be rejected The order approved by the banking court was set aside and the case was referred to the banking court for leave decision. patent advocate from Manoabad lawyer