Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASGHAR versus UMAR ASGHAR (MINOR)

Section 5, 14 (2) (c) and Schedule Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application to appeal the district judge's request for rehabilitation against the mother of two children for their care in the Tiled Suit Family Court Has excluded the case from this limit. Every month an appeal of Rs. 1000, filed by the father against the judgment, was dropped by the Family Court on the ground that he was not eligible under Section 14 (2) (c) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964. Because the verdict and order was passed by the Family Court. To each child up to a thousand rupees per month, which was less than a thousand rupees, justify when two or more plaintiffs were involved in the suit for rehabilitation and restored each to less than Rs 1,000 a month. Was gone, but the total amount of money to the plaintiffs was more than Rs one thousand, it would be a decision in which the creditor of the judgment had to pay more than one thousand rupees; Could not be divided because it is regrettable that two decrees be made in spirit and express in section 14 (2) (c) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 Will the rhetorical use - should be under a decree or the total amount of maintenance to be through. With this in mind, when the Family Court accepted the constitutional petition and filed an appeal against the decision, the appellate court declared the decision under which the appeal made by the applicant was returned, because the appellate court The illegal and illegal appeal filed by the applicant will be pending. On the merit \ r \ n \ r \ n jobs for advocates from Phagwar lawyer