MUHAMMAD SHAHZAD versus STATE
Section 497 (2) of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Section 6/9 bail, further inquiry Inspector / Section HA's grant was fully acknowledged that the drugs were recovered from the FIR and recovery memo accused. And his co-accused were allegedly arrested. The drafts that were drafted by him were not in his written form and, he signed only those documents, the inspector was unable to name the person or police officer who prepared the FIR and Both the drafting of the Recovery Memo FIR and the Recovery Memorandum, under which drug paraphernalia was recovered from the accused, and its co-accused were suspected to have been related to the recovery of narcotics from the accused. In the matter of further investigation, the accused was allowed in bail, in such circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Samundri lawyer