Section 22A, 22B & 200 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 appeals to the authority to direct the former Justice of the Peace for the entry of an intra-court case. As a result of the availability of alternative treatment of the complainant, the appellant obtained a car on lease from a bank and assigned the accused (respondent) the same responsibility in which the accused damaged the vehicle in the accident and agreed between the parties. It is believed that the accused will retain the car and pay the remaining installments. The bank, but allegedly misused the car instead of paying the installments to the bank, while the complainant had a chance to file an FIR against the accused under section 406, after which the accused had to prepare the fake documents. After allegedly sold the car, against which the complainant filed a petition before the Justice of Peace under Section 22A & 22B, CRPC of the proceedings, on which the plea was dismissed on the ground that the FIR Had already filed a case against the accused in connection with the misuse of the car. The constitutional petition was filed, but for that reason, it was rejected that the alternative remedy for filing a private complaint was the information available for the complainant's complaint that a single High Court judge heard the fact during the hearing on the constitutional petition. Found that the previous FIR was related to a different offense, while the contents of the application under Sections 22A and 22B, CRPC, revealed a different crime commission; that the single judge of the High Court had made Section 154, CR P. The essential provisions of C should be ignored
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
