Find a Lawyer

SAIF-UR-REHMAN versus STATE

Section 5 (2) Explanatory Code (XLV of 1860), Section 161 Definition of Evidence: A prosecutor's witness admitted in his cross-examination that he had not seen the complainant going to the accused for money, Syed witness. Further admitted that he had not even heard the conversation. During the prosecution's testimony between the complainant and the Special Magistrate, he admitted that he could not actually see the complainant handing over the bribe money to the accused at the place where the prosecutor's witness was present. Further admitted that he too could not hear the conversation between the complainant. And the accused complainant, appearing as the prosecutor's witness, said that the raiding magistrate had taken action at the police station prosecution, which, in view of the testimony, brought the prosecution's witness beyond the shadow of the suspect to bring home charges. Were unsuccessful, the trial court's conviction in trial cases was not valid, as the evidence for passing the impeachment was set aside by the trial court to prove the offense against the accused, and the sentence and sentence were set aside. He was acquitted of the charge by giving the benefit of the doubt. top advocate from Digri lawyer