Find a Lawyer

SHEIKH MUHAMMAD AYUB versus MUHAMMAD YOUSUF

A. XXXVII, R 3 Negotiable Devices Act (XXVI 1881), Section 118 suit based on unlawful checks, the plaintiff in the petition acknowledged in the petition and affidavit for leave to defend the case. The investment in which it has invested is related to the business of the parties. Defendant and defendant also recognized a certain amount of cash in the balance paid - the defendant claimed that the checks were issued - because of the money spent Accepted checks as security were dishonored as confessions as they were not arranged. The plaintiff and his son had issued further checks in favor of the plaintiff to satisfy the plaintiff's business creditors, thus executing the checks, issuing and unlawfully prosecuting the plaintiff after admission to the court. Caused Defendant's defense was entitled to a lawsuit and, in view of the facts, using his discretion, any document supporting the plaintiff's request for investment from him in the business transaction granted him leave. For non-submission, the plaintiff regarding the legality examined the record for the submission of the bond of bail so as to ascertain whether there was a practice of discharge on any condition. By the District Judge, the Defendant was unlawful, oblique and disrespectful, in fact the existence of a financial transaction between the parties by the plaintiff acknowledging the payment of the Plaintiff proved that the Plaintiff, the Defendant, checked. Nature and the value of the defense application calling the check as securities famous supreme court advocate from Tando Allahyar lawyer