Find a Lawyer

ZAFAR HUSSAIN versus UNITED BANK LIMITED THROUGH PRESIDENT AND 3 OTHERS

Sections 46, 47 (3) and 48 of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), requesting the removal of Section O15 jobs, with the High Court applicant / banker serving as driver. Appealed from performing employee. Section 302, PPC and he was convicted and sentenced. On filing an appeal against the trial court's decision, the applicant was acquitted and released from jail. Meanwhile, the applicant's services were terminated, which caused the applicant to file a complaint against his dismissal order, primarily on behalf of the bank, in response to the complaint request, based on compassion. It was requested that when the special leave was approved, it waits till the trial court's decision. The applicant had the plea bank because, after conviction of the applicant through the trial court, the position on which the applicant was working could not be vacated, the applicant's services were ordered by the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment Order. 15 (3). Standing Orders), the complaint filed by the applicant under Ordinance 1968 was rejected by the Labor Court Bank because the driver's post could not be vacated indefinitely, so it was decided that the applicant's simplicity. Terminate related services and, in addition to general legal obligations, the applicant was entitled to one month's reasonable salary in lieu of notice period, in which case, it could not be said West West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 Standing Order 15 (3) of The Bank is not endorsed by the bank famous lower court advocate from Manga Mandi lawyer