Find a Lawyer

ZAFAR IQBAL versus STATE

Section 2302 (b), on the basis of the value of the evidence, the ocular account presented by the complainant and the other witness of the prosecution was consistent with all material details of the prosecution's case, the said prosecution witnesses who were natural witnesses at all times The details were consistent, and the name of the accused, the weapon by him, the manner in which the incident occurred and there was no definite contradiction, aspects of the prosecution case said that the general investigation of the witnesses was of minor nature. There were some contradictions, and they were not material to reduce the value or the level. The credibility of their collection and their testimony will not be negatively affected. The presence of eye-witnesses present at the relevant time was largely feasible and reliable because the complainant and other eye witnesses, who were related to each other, lived near the site. The trial court correctly relied on his testimony in the circumstances. The prosecution sought medical evidence to support / support his testimony, which was entirely in accordance with the ocular testimony against the prosecution. Was able to prove the purpose set out and there is no doubt that this motive can be used to persuade a person. The accused had fled after the incident and was absconded for more than two years and was a strong indicator of his mind in this case, the evidence from the medical evidence, in view of the ocular testimony, fled. The allegation of prosecution of the accused against the deceased was proved and the accused was properly punished under section 230b (b), for the murder of the victim. female advocates from Rawala Kot lawyer