Sections 161, 497 (2) and 498 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), section 302/148/149/364 Qutel-e-Adm The accused's accused and co-accused allegedly kidnapped and killed the accused, and the role of the accused is attributed to the accused and the co-accused, while in the complainant's supplementary statement they were assigned a special role. Were fatally wounded. The accused and the accused were mentioned as unknown persons in the FIR, with no details given, but the complainant later made this statement to the accused and the co-accused through his statement to the police. He claimed that he and the prosecution's witnesses testified that he was the accused and co-accused. The accused, who killed the victim's statement, was later introduced by the complainant, where the location of the complaint was not disclosed and the prosecution's witnesses confronted the accused and the accomplices. The complainant's subsequent statement was merely a statement under Section 161, CR PC, which had no significance and could not be equated with the law. ? The supplemental statement with the first version of the crime report was given by the complainant six days after the incident, so there is every possibility that the nomination of the accused and the accompanying accused may result in deliberation and consultation. The matter was two. The version was given in an FIR and the second is in the Supplementary Statement, so the accused and co-accused persons were involved.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
