A. XVII, R 3 and O VI, R 18 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 8, 42 and 54 of the suit, declaration of possession, and amendment of the permanent injunction required by the plaintiffs His trial was granted and the defendants were instructed to file the amended case in which they were allowed by the trial court, but the defendant failed to file the case. The trial applies the provisions of OXVII, R 3, as instructed by the trial court. , The CPC dismissed the file filed by the plaintiffs for non-compliance with its previous orders, due to the absence of jurisdiction over the trial, the appeal was filed by the defendants against the judgment and order of the court. , The plaintiff had filed an appeal before the High Court, if any of the parties, who received the order of modification, did not amend the plaintiff accordingly within the time fixed for that purpose and if the court Time was not set within 14 days from the order date. er amendment permission granted, the party shall not be permitted to amend the defendant after the expiry of the delimitation time or for 14 days unless the time is upheld by the judicial provisions of X XII, R 3, CP. Is not properly raised because it was not applied in the case. The trial court should have settled the matter in accordance with O VI, R 18, the CPC and the trial court did not have the authority to dismiss the case before the plaintiffs filed an appeal before the district judge, which returned them And the plaintiffs filed an appeal just 17 days after that. Delayed every day
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
