Find a Lawyer

BASHIR KHAN versus STATE

Sections 497, 87 and 204 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 34, 148 and 149 bail, the defendant's refusal to pressurize his request for bail because his co-accused had already granted bail. Which was allowed by the trial court. The complainant of the High Court did not oppose the bail on the basis that the accused's case was related to the alleged accused being a prominent fugitive, who was well acquainted with the charges against him, for a long time, before the law. Was not chosen to be cast. The defendant's deliberations were deliberate and unclear which made his case prominent; the co-accused motive was the political enmity between the accused and the complainant under which he was prosecuted under Sec & 87 & 9PC. had gone. The accused was also named, who separated his case from the bail-out accused and would deprive the law-abiding individual of certain procedures and alternatives. The undisclosed intention of the prosecution can be prosecuted and its direct purpose is to distinguish its case from that of the co-accused, but also on the basis that the rules for the grant and cancellation of bail were quite different. The accused was connected to the commission of the crime and the defendants did not protest the grant of bail on the merits of the prosecution's case, but only provoked provocation on the basis of consistency, so that these distinguishing features could be called bail. The request for was excluded with a trial instruction. The court will begin a trial against any further delays Pakistan, top advocate family court from Khurian wala lawyer