Find a Lawyer

WASIM REHAN versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY DEFENCE

Sections 3, 5, 8 and 12 of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petitioner Maintenance Petitioner alleged that the Cantonment Board had obstructed the entry of every road to Cantonment a year ago and employed an army soldier. Was. Likewise and they had begun to interfere with the movement of citizens on the public road, which caused great unrest among the public, the petitioner had prayed that the cantonment board proceeded without legal authority. Be legalized and the applicant's rights be deemed ineffective The petitioner of the general public had further prayed that the Cantonment Board was barred from violating the fundamental rights guaranteed by the constitutional doctrine of exercising jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution. No other appropriate remedies were provided by the source for which the appropriate treatment was available to the applicant; in the present case, voicing your complaint in relation to the relevant provisions of the Northwest Border Public Property (Termination of Extensions) Act, 1977 The petitioner, otherwise the agitating party was not the High Court, under his circumstances Annie could not use the jurisdiction. criminal advocate from Chak 4 b c lawyer