Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD UZAIR SIDDIQUI versus STATE

Section 9 and 33 (4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (v. 1898), the definition of evidence for the elimination of section 516 drug overdose, to prove that a certain quantity of drug was recovered from the accused, The gambler must establish it through important evidence. For this purpose, pursuant to subsection (4) of Section 33 of the Drug Substances Control Act 1997, it was necessary that the pending investigation or trial, the bulk of the narcotic substance, be made available under the provisions of Section 516A. Disposal or removal should be done according to the procedure laid out. CCP Whenever the prosecution requires the court to demand that all drug paraphernalia be secured with the court's order, the written permission and certificate obtained by the trial court must be recorded. Will bring Its destruction has been issued either by a trial judge or magistrate who can oversee the process which will include all reasonable details and references to the FIR, including the date of the incident; the details of the case with the accused. Title; the application of the law department and the description of the police station where the case was registered and the date, time and place where the narcotics were removed, said the documents were to be brought on record according to the evidence and at least for that purpose. Fewer magistrates who supervised the destruction. Submitted to the police officer / person who was dealing with the bulk during the trial, otherwise it would be difficult for the court to obtain the required signal under the third provision on Section 516A, CRPC, especially in such case. Where I refused to export a certain quantity of drugs from the defense suspect jobs for advocates from Lodhran lawyer