Section 302 (b) / 34 Qatl e amd, Joint Intent Evidence Testimony, Decline in the location occurred on a bright day at 1:30 to 30 minutes, the two parties were closely related to one of the deceased partner His wife had a brother, two co-accused who were found innocent during the investigation, they were tried by the trial court and the complainant was acquitted and two prosecution witnesses supported the FIR version. Was. They all admitted that the incident happened at the moment the medical evidence confirmed the arrest of the ocular account, weapons, the suspect, a type of injury and the location of the seat, and even after the incident took place. There was nothing in the record to indicate that either. The prosecutor witnesses the injury to the witness's right thumb, saying that the witness was a prisoner in the same house as being the wife of a co-accused, his presence in her presence was natural, the accused recovered a knife on which The stain was later found. A practical account of the recovery of weapons of crime has also been confirmed with human blood, the motive part of the incident was regularly mentioned in the FIR. Even the defense had admitted that the deceased had come to his house to incite the wife of the accused and that the incident originated from the incident was not pre-murder and even the accused had applied for his defense. And prosecuted. The deputy superintendent of police brought his case under general exception as the court's witness admitted that it was the accused involved in injuring the victim, that the accused's involvement in the murder of the victim was fully established, but the accused's The position is
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
