MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus JUDGE BANKING COURT NO.1 MULTAN
Section 15 and 23 of the Transfer Property Act (IV of 1882), Section 52 mortgage property sale applied to the principle of Los Pendens were not aware of the suit property buyer and decree that appellants believed when they applied for mortgage property. When purchased, they had taken all precautions before purchase and had no knowledge of the order and had no mention in the rights record. The bank has been charged with any kind of property, and for that reason, the said property cannot be denied for the satisfaction of the order. The appellant purchased the mortgaged property three months after the decree was passed under section 23 of the financial institutions. Finance Ordinance 2001, a case was automatically converted into a plea bargain and no formal request was imposed by the bank appellants purchased the suit property at a price lower than the previous buyer's , And because of this, the principle of purchase lease pendenza is not correct, the appeal is dismissed from the appeal.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
