AMANULLAH versus THE STATE
Articles 435, 439 and 514 of the Constitution of P4 Stat (1973), Article 203 DD Amendment were filed against the High Court scope revision petition against the order of the sessions judge to impose fines on the applicant, Only federal law was challenged because of this. The court had jurisdiction to amend the Judicial Magistrate's case in relation to the case of the Hudood Law in relation to the enforcement of the Judicial Law by any criminal court, but this case relates to the case related to the decision under the Hodg Rules. There was no hard breath, but under that the session judge's order was revised. The applicant / bail was granted on bail which could not be presented to the accused and his bail was confiscated.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Ubaro lawyer
