Find a Lawyer

KARL JOHN JOSEPH versus THE STATE

Section 9 (c) and 25 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XAX 1965), Section 13 (e) were examined at length from the testimony of the accused to prove the conviction, but contradicted by the evidence of both witnesses. Nothing could be brought against the record. The witnesses were the same on all material aspects of the case, except for the slightest contradictions or contradictions that could appear in the evidence when recorded similarly after an interval of 8/9 months when minor contradictions and contradictions were easily ignored. It can be said that when the oral evidence presented by the prosecution was credible to the witnesses' testimony, it said that after minor contradictions, no change was made to the prosecution's story nor to the prosecution's case nor to the testimony of the witnesses. Was affected. best law firms from Kundina lawyer