RAFIQUE versus THE STATE
Definitions of sections 6565 AA and 5 395 evidence were filed with a delay of three days for which no comprehensible explanation was offered, two co-accused were acquitted on the same evidence. , The accused's conviction was based on misinterpretation of evidence in the circumstances, one of the alleged abductors gave rise to speculation against the prosecutor, two identity tests took place, the first after 3/2 months and the second after 9 months. Went on to say that the identity tests did not comply with the law and the police. The rules did not support the prosecution's identification of an indictment, it could be safely said in the circumstances because nothing was recovered from the four suspects. There was no allegation that the kidnappers were charged with ransom. And no one was charged. It is alleged that they asked for money
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Kahror Pacca lawyer