Sections 302 (b) (c) and 364 Qatil Amad, accused of double murder in praise of the evidence of kidnapping and sudden provocation by the accused, neither appeared in court nor produced any defense witness, inquiry report and post There is a contradiction in the martam report. The chemical inspector's report was included in a fake defense version, spreading that the dead vaginal bushes were not stained with semen, but his underwear was allegedly stained with the mini lady doctor. , Based on a chemical inspector's report, he had stated that the deceased had been sexually assaulted. In the absence of any significant body of evidence of intercourse accuracy, no basis can be laid for merely compiling the report of the Chemical Examiner; the opinion of the Lady Lady doctor was of no use to the defense version; Failed to prove request. The case of provocation was deliberate double murder, which did not fall within the purview of Section 302 (c), PPC and the trial court. Under this section, the exception to the accused was the exception, the unclean verdict was set aside and the accused was convicted under Section 2302 (b), the PPC sentenced to death for committing the murder intentionally. The accused was sentenced to life imprisonment for running alongside two courts. The accused shall be entitled to benefit under Section 382B, CR PC
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
