Section 2 302 (b) / Q 34 Qatil-e-Am, conviction for complying with evidence with intent, delay in reporting the matter to the police and witnesses to the complaint are residents of the same village where the incident occurred. Also, at the time of the incident, the victim, on the spot, was neither unnatural nor impossible, even the presence of witnesses at the time of the profession, was confessed by the accused, although at different lengths the eyewitnesses were examined at length. Investigations were made, but their evidence testified against each other on all material aspects of the case, their testimony being on the victim. The accused and injured character were inspiring and trusted complainants who are the real maternal aunts. It was unlikely that he would falsely implicate the accused and release the real culprit for the murder of his close killer and relative. Medical evidence in such cases was an unusual occurrence, allegedly by the prosecution. The molecular account of the prosecution's motion was fully supported, the pistol was not proven and the police station was empty, it cannot be ruled out that the false vacancy was made from the pistol and the pistol. Office of the forensic science laboratory laboratory story recovered, not appealed to IQ No, to rely on the alleged recovery identified the accused was not safe to rely on positive reports and accused the forensic science laboratory was not secure. On the day of the incident, he was summoned by his in-laws / complaining party to fraudulently compromise and when
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
