Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TARIQ versus STATE

Section 426 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302 (b) conviction of a convicted AMD conviction, the defendant's grant was sentenced under Section 302 (b), PPC and sentenced to life imprisonment, The trial court did not accept the alleged recovery at the trial. Although the specific role was attributed to the accused and the co-accused persons mentioned in the FIR, all the accomplices were acquitted, but no special injury accused prima facie material was discharged on the suspended suspension of the record. The accused was accordingly suspended and released on bail

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• BANKERS EQUITY LIMITED v. DECENT INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LIMITED 2013 CLD 1780
• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. State 2013 YLR 1782
• SHAH NAWAZ alias CHULLU v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1782
• IMRAN alias MANOO v. State 2013 MLD 1790
• Ms. AYESHA SIDDIQA v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB 2013 YLR 1796
• MUHAMMAD NADEEM v. MUHAMMAD MUMTAZ AKHTER KAHLOON 2013 CLC 1796
• SHAHBAZ A. KHOKHAR v. HABIB BANK LIMITED 2013 CLD 1802
• AHMED RAZA v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1804

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

best advocate from Chilas lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes