Find a Lawyer

MS. AYESHA SIDDIQA versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB

Qualification and Rules of Contribution E Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Application Failure to name the college in the preferred form of admission to the Medical College, the effect candidate was aware at the time of filling in the admission form that he had to mention to each college that Wanted to be considered for admission prospectus and the admission form was clear in stating the importance of the preferred form and highlighting the basis on which the High Court could direct the defendants to consider the applicant for admission to the college in which Was not specified. The applicant of the priority list made a conscious decision at the time of filling out the form, so she was bound to such a decision that the constitutional application was dismissed.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. State 2013 YLR 1782
• SHAH NAWAZ alias CHULLU v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1782
• IMRAN alias MANOO v. State 2013 MLD 1790
• MUHAMMAD TARIQ v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1791
• MUHAMMAD NADEEM v. MUHAMMAD MUMTAZ AKHTER KAHLOON 2013 CLC 1796
• SHAHBAZ A. KHOKHAR v. HABIB BANK LIMITED 2013 CLD 1802
• AHMED RAZA v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1804
• Barrister SAJJAD AHMED SATTI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Ministry of Defence 2013 CLC 1804

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

best advocate from Bahawalpur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes