Section 42 and Q45 of the Code of Evidence (of 10 of 1984), Arts 117 and 120 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), section 115 to verify the sale of the suit. It is claimed that he claimed that the owners of the suit were the owners of the land and that there was no legal value for the entries in the record of the revenue. The defendants upheld the claim that they purchased the suit land. And the record of the taxation supported their version, the trial court and the lower appeals court jointly decided in favor of the defendants. It was up to the defendants to prove the valid sale of the land in favor of the plaintiff's advance or to confirm the validity that compliance with all the conditions mentioned in section 42 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967 was necessary for the valid verification of the mutation. Without complying, the change was in the eyes of the law without any effect on the rights of our forefathers and the rights of their predecessors, as well as the defendants' subpoena proceedings were neither a judicial proceeding nor awarded any honor. The reality of change was challenged, it depended on the parties. On this contention, the High Court refused to close its eyes and verify the conclusions without any use of mind to prove the original transaction. The High Court had to exercise its jurisdiction under section 115, CPC, and interfere with the unlawful consequences recorded by the courts below, so as to remove the unjust injustice committed by the two courts below. Have to do, when they overlook the basic provisions of the High Court of Law
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
