MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH versus THE STATE
Appealing to Section 302 Evidence Motion motive, which was not otherwise requested by the prosecution, sought to prove the defendant's extra-judicial confession by statements of two witnesses, Did not meet the proof requirements. The court confessed that the witnesses belonged to the victim and to the complainant and that they had shown strange conduct as they learned of the murder of the victim and allowed the accused to go with him. Granted, the two legally passed on to the legal heirs of the deceased. The said witnesses are related to the deceased as well as the complainant and there is no other contentious evidence to prove their truth. The evidence of said illegal confession cannot be believed at any point. There was an unexpected event
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Wah Cantt lawyer
