Find a Lawyer

DILSHAD AHMAD versus STATE

Article 497 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/380/458 bail, the defendant's grant was not named in the FIR after the suspect's arrest remained on physical remand, but was not recovered, He was charged with an unidentified identity offense. The investigating officer reported the false involvement of the accused and according to his report prepared under section 173, recommended his expulsion, CCPL al-magistrate did not agree with the report of the investigating officer, on the basis of which It had no content. It can be said that the accused was in fact involved in the alleged crime, without any defamatory material, the accused's alleged supplementary statement, there was no case pending in which the accused was found guilty of theft of goats, as the prosecution Claimed it was merely an oral claim to be guilty of his law, it was not enough to deny bail privileges, the accused was not a historical foil. Dee was no longer needed for investigative purposes and the prosecution's case His further detention in the case, which did not name him, could not be prosecuted. Yin and relatives were relatives. The accused had no chance to tamper with the prosecution's evidence. Column No. 2 accused, in the circumstances, was granted bail immigration advocates email from Sakrand lawyer