TOYOTA TSUSHO CORPORATION versus DR. SHER AFGAN KHAN NIAZI
OI, R 10 (2) referring to the parties' names in the claim for damages by application under Order I, Rule 10, the CPC filed the order against the plaintiff of the court filing the application under Order I, Rule 10 (2). The defendant was enforced with the permission of the company. ) In order to disclose the name, which was rejected by the trial court, the two defendants had already moved a petition which was dismissed in the Supreme Court for that reason, the defendant had a 25% stake in the company's equity. And that was the main ingredient and the defendant's position was amazing. Along with the other defendants and did not deserve any different treatment The amendment was rejected in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Jehlum lawyer
