Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302 / 337A (i) / 34 bail, further investigation in this case was filed with a delay of one day in the grant of FIR, which was filed by F It was shown in the IR's case. The incident was a sudden outbreak that triggered verbal recurrence and was deferred due to injuries, element of primatization or pre-concert primary fees, absent in this case, in which case the accused The victim was not hurt and the accused was relieved of his responsibility to bring a witness to the prosecution's witness with PAWA only the accused had no motive for killing the accused and in the strange circumstances of the case with the accused. There was also a question about sharing a common intention with your co-accused. The alleged liability for the crime of murder, allegedly by his co-accused, was a question that required further investigation, which allegedly caused the injury caused by the prosecution's testimony by the accused. Was attracted to her. Section 7 337A (i), PPC which was guaranteed invoice was already submitted after the completion of the investigation, to continue the custody of the accused in these cases, in which case, the trial of any beneficial purpose. That was unlikely, and further investigations into his crime were called. Bail was admitted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
