COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE versus CHICAGO METAL WORKS
Refunds for Sections 120, 170 and 171 were paid in connection with the payment of the dispute of the Regulation. Vulnerability Word may have been used in section 171 (1) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, filing a request for a refund was not an option for the Commissioner to request a refund within two years. used because the taxpayer may also demand a refund against his future tax liability or make adjustments against the demand under other taxes. Under the Ordinance Word used in Section 171 (2) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, not only was it mandatory to submit a refund request, but also in accordance with the advice of the Rolls Commissioner and the application form under section 171 of the application I should be. ()) The Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, had to convince itself that the tax was overpaid and that it was obliged to reduce the return on payment, by adjusting the tax payable under the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, And other laws requiring the High Court to agree with the interpretation given by the Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue and the question of law was negatively decided in favor of the authorities. \ R \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
