Sections 2 302 (b), 34, 7at i, and 606060 in the court, with evidence of joint intention, robbery or robbery, death or serious injury to the home, suspicion of evidence of guilt or house breakdown at night. The beneficiary and the prosecution witnesses, the inconsistent and explicit corrections to the incident, to create contradictions between the medical evidence and statements available in the crime report, to present a more probable story, and to involve more people. Such improvements and calculations have been presented in connection with the trial of the case. Through prosecution, suspicions and unreliable characteristics, nor any details of the offenders, were provided by the witnesses under Sections 154 and 161, CRPC, by their respective witnesses. Did not present, the identity of all the suspects, none of the prosecution witnesses assigned any role to any of the accused Identification Parade Item, which was sufficient to declare the test identification parade, for medical evidence Was not good, no matter the crime news, the crime scene occupied by the incident site was about one Later, the offices of the Franzic Science Laboratory were sent. Month of the arrest of the accused. And if the crime was cleared, and sent to the laboratory after the arrest of the accused, about twenty days after the alleged crime was recovered at the request of the offender, it would be safe to rely on the positive report of the Franz Science Laboratory 30 bore. was not. The pistol was allegedly recovered from all the suspects, but, only 30 bore pistols were sent to the laboratory, which added that the suspects
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
