Find a Lawyer

MALIK MUHAMMAD HAYAT AND ANOTHER versus THE STATE

Two years after the alleged FIR of the testimony of Sections 10 (2) and 16 of the evidence was filed with a false explanation that reflected the prosecution's fact of the prosecution's story, as documentary evidence. Why the form is not available. In the preceding injunction to dissolve the marriage between the complainant and the woman accused, it was not presented during the trial and relied on the complainant's assertion that the case for dissolution of marriage by the female accused. The trial was dismissed by the trial court. It was completely abandoned to consider the aforementioned verdict on the record, otherwise in view of such unconfirmed documentary evidence, no action could be filed against the accused, the accused was acquitted. law websites from Naukundi lawyer