The 11-day delay in filing the FIR for the appreciation of the section 10 (2) evidence was not considered satisfactory for satisfactory reasons, even though the delay in denying the prosecution's case and the testimony of the witnesses was false. This was not enough, but in this case the other circumstances were to be kept in view and given the proper weight, the accused filed a case against the complainant for dissolution of marriage two days before filing the FIR, Section 222, In its statement under the CCPC, the defendant's case was fully supported by the defendant in order to show that someone had obtained both Had agreed not to commit together, a medico-legal report or to support the allegation of adultery Chemical Examiner reports.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
