Section 10 (3) / 18 conviction of testimony, trial court reduction convicted the accused on the basis that he entered the complainant's home and tried to commit adultery with him but On the arrival of the witnesses, he escaped. The trial court held that it was not the case where the adultery victim was actually T in the case, the accused was convicted and he was found guilty of sections 18 and 10 (3) of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance. Was convicted under In 1979, the accused pleaded that he had been sentenced to two years, which had already accepted his request to accept two years' imprisonment. Release ordered
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
