AMJAD PERVEZ versus THE STATE
Section 17 (3) / 9 (1) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), section 397 Definition of Proof After the incident, the prosecution dismissed its case without any doubt, however, the court did not consider all of the prosecution's witnesses Appointed a Muzuki for not only the two shopkeepers but also other victims of the case who were present at the relevant time, fulfilling the legal requirements substantially, as they were in full discretion with the prosecution witnesses. He was only superficial, though no law was described in this law, but it was evident that at least one joke was appointed for each witness. Needed to confirm his role. , Behavior and matters In addition, these individuals were required to be present during questioning of the prosecution's witnesses.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Taxila lawyer
