Article 426 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), section 302 (b) / 34 of the convict, the elderly and co-accused of the joint intention to suspend the sentence, accused him of murdering the accused party. The court sentenced the offender to life imprisonment and life imprisonment. The conviction of the accused was that according to the prosecution's own case, he was not awarded any injury to any of the killed persons. He was charged. The role of raising firearms was not appropriate in the circumstances of the trial, and that he was approximately 75 75 years of age and was entitled to suspension of sentence because of sensationalism. The co-accused opened fire on the victim and then allegedly fired indiscriminately. No special injury was attributed to the accused, who was an expert, there was no possibility of hearing the appeal in the near future, pleas were allowed and the sentence imposed on the accused was suspended. r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
