Additional evidence of the O XLI R 27 suit declaration, recording of the plaintiff's appeal against the trial dismissal by trial was pending before the Court of Appeal, when the defendants filed additional evidence under A XLI R 27, CPC. The application for a pass was moved in which its arguments were allowed. Defendants stated that the document was originally available on record before the trial court, who gave its findings about it and did not accept the document from the plaintiff's request for record of additional evidence. It turns out that the plaintiffs want to file a certified copy of the petition transferred to the Chief Settlement Commissioner / Member Board of Revenue and acknowledged that the document was not available at the time of recording of the evidence of the parties during the trial. , However, since the certified copy of the said document is effective, it is the plaintiff's claim form The specific ground that was placed on record before the trial court was not believed to be the case, after the trial court filed the case, and the defendants had already issued a certified copy of the said document. The application was authorized by the Chief Settlement Commissioner / Member Board of Revenue, the only authority that can confirm the authenticity of the document, after the trial was dismissed by trial Was given which can be considered by the appellate court, especially in the case of trial court findings. The trial court had voted in the same dilapidated condition, after the competent authority to verify the document away
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
