Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 420/468/471 Corruption Prevention Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) of fraud, fraud, bail as a forged document, resignation, investigation Officer's Grant After investigating a criminal case, the innocent Section H affiliate involved in the accused agreed with the opinion of the accused Investigation Officer to cancel the said case and to appear in court for CRP under section 173. Was prepared after formal action. There was a big difference after the appropriate orders and it was not understood when and under whom the report was placed before the concerned magistrate under Section 173, CR PC and who forged the Magistrate's Sub-Inspector Investigation Officer. The order was declared fake. In this case it was considered to be a fact of fact, but who could be burdened with the responsibility of forgery of the magistrate's order? The data collected by the investigating officer of the current case was not answered by the police in this regard. The fake order did not indicate that the case was registered on its own or that the police issued a fake order only to cancel its application, even a record of no date was tolerated. It is likely that the Area Magistrate had dismissed the inquiry officer's opinion and approved the order to furnish challan against the accused, the last time the accused was behind bars. For about two and a half months and no further investigation was required, further investigation of the crime of the accused is required under section 497 (2), the CC accused was admitted on bail under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
