Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/396/412 murder of a robber, receiving stolen property in the commission of a robbery of a robbery, denial of charges against the accused and accomplices, The man, who was killed for displaying resistance during a commission of robbery and co-accused, allegedly fled the scene of the crime in a car, which was reported by police on the same day, After the test identification was parade. It was alleged that he was involved in the case because of suspicion. He was not found armed during the arrest. That the evidence related to the test identification parade is contradictory, and the retrieval of the accused's complainant's cash and National Identity Card (NIC), made it difficult to say that the evidence was falsified by the prosecution. And other victims of the robbery made a statement. During the Identity Parade, one of the victims of the robbery was killed because he had shown resistance during the identification parade, with a brief explanation of the outside characteristics of the accused persons as they could identify them. A case of robbery has begun by the accused and his accomplice, and a trial court has already investigated the four witnesses at the trial under which the accused was charged. The PC number was present to suppose that further investigation into the crime of the accused was sought in the case of e-section 497 (2). Under the circumstances, the accused's CCP bail plea was rejected.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
