Section 16, the defendant of the evidence, allegedly attracted the victim, who remained with her for a day, but she was not subjected to rape, nor was she treated as abusive. That the prosecution has stated, that the provisions of section 16 of the Enforcement Ordinance (Enforcement Hoodood) Ordinance 1979 were constituted, in which case it was not attracted that the alleged abductor's brother had filed an FIR. 6 days after the AR was filed without any explanation. For the delay, which framed the whole case because he was not ready to marry the accused to his sister's victim, the trial court failed to consider the entire evidence in its original context. That was the result. Failure to do justice to the accused accused of threatening litigation, the accused acquitted in circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
