MUHAMMAD JAVAID versus THE STATE
The appeal against the section 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203 DDBritish record did not show that the accused had shared the common intention of the principal accused causing the murder of the deceased woman. It is alleged that the accused was equipped with a rifle at the time of the incident and did not raise a firearm for the inmates of the house and was not present in the FIR nor in the statements of the prosecution witnesses under Section 161, CC eyewitnesses Also did not mention the presence of the accused at the relevant location. After the time when, after his victory, it was alleged that his innocence was taken advantage of and that the evidence on record did not yield the only result of his crime, the appeal against the accused was acquitted accordingly. Excluded
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Bat Khela lawyer
