GUL BAHAR versus THE STATE
Under section 17 (3) of the Explanatory Code (XLV of 1860), the definition of testimony under section 392 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance 1979, no witness was subjected to the requisite clemency. The prosecution's witnesses may also be punished severely, including the complainant. These were all independent witnesses who made permanent statements and their testimony expressed confidence. Witnesses also identified the suspect, who had taken away the motorcycle. Defendant's request was rigorously put on record The plaintiff's case was a simple robbery
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Tharo Shah lawyer
