MST. SAJIDA ALIAS SHAZIA AND ANOTHER versus THE STATE
Appreciating the Section 10 (2) Eyewitness who was actually an informant, according to the FIR, he entered the accused's house and saw him committing adultery; both of the witnesses were summoned to the court at the time of argument. Was made and they sought clarification. Under which law, they committed adultery in the accused's house and violated the privacy of their home, but they could not provide a definitive explanation, neither are the witnesses at the location of the incident. The residents of the area came forward to support the prosecution's story
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Nankana Sahib lawyer
