Find a Lawyer

ZULQARNAIN versus SNGPL THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER

A. XLIII, R 3 Applicant's appeal was dismissed by the appellate court on the ground that the applicant had not issued notice to the defendant before filing the appeal and hence the accuracy of O XLIII, R 3, CPC. Did not comply with the provisions of The records reveal that the applicant served the respondent with a legal notice, which was sent by postmaster certified postal receipts and attached to the civil amendment, in light of such documents. Had put this order aside. The appellate court and the trial court were remanded on remand

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• MUKHTAR AHMAD GONDAL v. DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE), LAHORE 2013 PLD 498
• Mst. ISHRAT BIBI v. Mst. HASHMAT BIBI 2013 CLC 499
• MUMTAZ ALI v. GHULAM HUSSAIN 2013 YLR 499
• SAHIB GAS WAYS v. The BANK OF PUNJAB 2013 CLD 501
• NAZIR AHMAD v. State 2013 PCrLJ 505
• State v. ABDUL SHAGOOF 2013 PLD 506
• RASHID v. RETURNING OFFICER, NANKANA SAHIB 2013 PLD 509
• TAUQEER AHMED v. MUHAMMAD ZAMAN 2013 YLR 512

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

best law firms from Jaranwala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes