Section 42 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Suite, Revenue Office Not Reading Valid Letters and Evidence for Investigation of Variation Gift / favor in favor of defendants on fraud and fraud. Accused of changing Tamils. The trial court and the lower appellate court simultaneously dismissed the case and the appeal filed by the plaintiff to prove the valid gift / submission of three components to Tamilak, such as offer, acceptance and possession, was illegal but Defendant's name was not included in the revenue record. Authorization process was completed at the residence of the Tehsildar (Revenue Officer), which was a violation of Section 42 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967 and it had entries in the Revenue Record in the form of mutation till the final proof of ownership. No, unless the transaction in the case which was confirmed was Lee established from the evidence, which was not proved by the defendant's High Court in exercise of the jurisdiction, the facts were given by the two courts below. A search was made together and a decision was made in favor of the claimant.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
