Section 497 (5) of the Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), sections 392 and 397/34 of theft, robbery or robbery, with intent to remedy death or serious injury under section 497 (5), CCPC Malala Police The High Court, while issuing a notice under Section 497 (5) of the case, said that it appears that the order of bail has been neglected. Police were accused of legal action by the police, causing them to file a petition against the station house officer under Section 22A & 22B, CRPC. Justice of Peace directed the station house officer not to disturb the accused indiscriminately and his family was later arrested and confined by the same station house officer, hence the accused's wife, section 491, C.C. A petition for habeas corpus was filed under the PC, in which the court appointed a bailiff to retrieve the accused Detino from police custody, during which stage, the station house officer filed an FIR complaint Created the statement and stopped it. In this case, from the date of the accused's involvement in the crime, with the date of his recovery through the bailiff, the suspect's residential address was found from the complainant's address, which gave rise to the possibility that the complainant and his The witnesses knew. And the accused was aware, even before the date of the test identification parade, the possibility could not be ruled out that the accused was involved in the case due to the wire being pulled by the police. The trial against the accused has already started. Was, however, ordered to be granted bail by the trial court. Ideally not good
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
