Sections 7 and 22 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908) A IX, R 13 The case for retaliation was pronounced against the accused. The defendant's opinion was that the application for leave for defense in advance was dismissed and the order was dismissed. His request under IX, R, 13, CPC should be allowed to revoke a previous party order, the validity banking court dismissed the petition for leave to defend the qualification and it was claimed that The hearing was rejected because the decree was granted after the merit application for leave to defend. , This decree was enforceable by appeal under Section 22 of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance 2001 and the filing of the application under Order IX, Rule 13, CPC was misrepresented and the appeals dismissed. Was.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
