RASHIDA PARVEEN versus THE STATE AND 4 OTHERS
Section 365/148/149 Criminal Code (v. 1898), section 417 appeals against the acquitted defendants for nearly six years, and on numerous occasions summons for the prosecution's testimony. And warrants were also issued. , But he did not present the trial court, after six years 'interval, after refusing to postpone further for the prosecution's evidence and refused to file the defendants' verdict on the basis that any of the prosecution's files on the accused Evidence was not available, valid litigation could not be licensed. It was the prosecutor's responsibility to extend the torture of the accused, refusing to present his evidence indefinitely, because of the delay in the case. So as to refrain from further postponement in preparation for the prosecution's evidence.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Kachhi/Bolan lawyer
